Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 407
Filtrar
2.
JAMA ; 331(6): 482-490, 2024 02 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349371

RESUMO

Importance: Repeated mass distribution of azithromycin has been shown to reduce childhood mortality by 14% in sub-Saharan Africa. However, the estimated effect varied by location, suggesting that the intervention may not be effective in different geographical areas, time periods, or conditions. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of twice-yearly azithromycin to reduce mortality in children in the presence of seasonal malaria chemoprevention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of single-dose azithromycin for prevention of all-cause childhood mortality included 341 communities in the Nouna district in rural northwestern Burkina Faso. Participants were children aged 1 to 59 months living in the study communities. Interventions: Communities were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral azithromycin or placebo distribution. Children aged 1 to 59 months were offered single-dose treatment twice yearly for 3 years (6 distributions) from August 2019 to February 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause childhood mortality, measured during a twice-yearly enumerative census. Results: A total of 34 399 children (mean [SD] age, 25.2 [18] months) in the azithromycin group and 33 847 children (mean [SD] age, 25.6 [18] months) in the placebo group were included. A mean (SD) of 90.1% (16.0%) of the censused children received the scheduled study drug in the azithromycin group and 89.8% (17.1%) received the scheduled study drug in the placebo group. In the azithromycin group, 498 deaths were recorded over 60 592 person-years (8.2 deaths/1000 person-years). In the placebo group, 588 deaths were recorded over 58 547 person-years (10.0 deaths/1000 person-years). The incidence rate ratio for mortality was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67-1.02; P = .07) in the azithromycin group compared with the placebo group. The incidence rate ratio was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.72-1.36) in those aged 1 to 11 months, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.67-1.27) in those aged 12 to 23 months, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94) in those aged 24 to 59 months. Conclusions and Relevance: Mortality in children (aged 1-59 months) was lower with biannual mass azithromycin distribution in a setting in which seasonal malaria chemoprevention was also being distributed, but the difference was not statistically significant. The study may have been underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03676764.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Azitromicina , Mortalidade da Criança , Malária , Humanos , Azitromicina/provisão & distribuição , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Burkina Faso/epidemiologia , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Quimioprevenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade da Criança/tendências , Malária/epidemiologia , Malária/mortalidade , Malária/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estações do Ano , Lactente , Pré-Escolar
5.
DST j. bras. doenças sex. transm ; 35jan. 31, 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1429002

RESUMO

Introduction: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum. In Brazil, its incidence has increased, along with the lack of penicillin, the antibiotic of choice for congenital syphilis, from 2014 to 2017. During this period, children were treated with alternative drugs, but to date, data from the scientific literature do not recommend another antibiotic. Objective: To compare the progression, according to the established treatment, and evaluate the follow-up in health care facilities in Vila Velha (Espírito Santo) of children with congenital syphilis aged up to two years, born in Hospital Infantil e Maternidade Alzir Bernardino Alves ­ a reference in neonatology and low-risk pregnancy in the state at the time ­ from 2015 to 2016, when the hospital experienced a greater lack of penicillin. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional observational study based on data from medical records of the hospital and other healthcare facilities in the city. We performed statistical analyses, per health district, of epidemiological and sociodemographic data, as well as those related to visits, their frequency, and clinical profile, according to the follow-up parameters proposed by the Ministry of Health at the time. Results: Medical records of 121 children were evaluated, presenting as the main findings: only 35% of the children completed the follow-up; among those treated with ceftriaxone, 55.2% completed the follow-up, and 100% of the children whose venereal disease research laboratory was greater than that of their mother at birth completed the follow-up. Of the symptomatic children at birth who remained or became symptomatic at follow-up, 58.8% used ceftriaxone. Conclusion: Among symptomatic children at birth, most of those treated with ceftriaxone remained symptomatic at follow-up. The Counseling and Testing Center was the most successful facility in the follow-up of these children. District 5 had the lowest success rate in the follow-up of these patients, and districts 1 and 2 showed the lowest rates of appropriate approach to congenital syphilis during follow-up. (AU)


Introdução: A sífilis é uma infecção sexualmente transmissível causada pela bactéria Treponema pallidum. No Brasil, sua incidência vem aumentando, acompanhada da falta de penicilina, antibiótico de escolha para a sífilis congênita, no período de 2014­2017. Nesse período, as crianças foram tratadas com medicamentos alternativos, porém dados da literatura científica até o momento não recomendam outro antibiótico. Objetivo: Comparar a evolução, de acordo com o tratamento instituído, e avaliar o acompanhamento nas unidades de saúde em Vila Velha (ES), até os dois anos de idade, das crianças com sífilis congênita nascidas no Hospital Infantil e Maternidade Alzir Bernardino Alves ­ referência em neonatologia e gravidez de baixo risco no estado na época ­ de 2015 a 2016, período em que houve maior falta de penicilina no hospital. Métodos: Estudo observacional do tipo transversal, retrospectivo, baseado em dados dos prontuários do hospital e outras Unidades de Saúde do município. Foram analisados estatisticamente, por região de saúde, dados epidemiológicos, sociodemográficos, bem como relativos às consultas, sua periodicidade e ao perfil clínico, de acordo com os parâmetros de seguimento propostos pelo Ministério da Saúde na época. Resultados: Avaliaram-se os prontuários de 121 crianças, obtendo-se como principais achados: somente 35% das crianças tiveram seguimento completo; das crianças tratadas com ceftriaxona, 55,2% tiveram seguimento completo, e 100% das crianças que tiveram VDRL maior que o da mãe no parto completaram o seguimento. Das crianças sintomáticas ao nascimento e que permaneceram ou ficaram sintomáticas no seguimento, 58,8% fizeram uso de ceftriaxona. Conclusão: Das crianças sintomáticas ao nascimento, as tratadas com ceftriaxona, em sua maioria, mantiveram-se sintomáticas no seguimento. O Centro de Testagem e Aconselhamento teve maior êxito no acompanhamento dessas crianças. A região 5 teve a menor taxa de êxito no seguimento desses pacientes, e as regiões 1 e 2 menor taxa de abordagem correta para sífilis congênita durante o seguimento. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Criança , Adulto , Penicilinas/provisão & distribuição , Sífilis Congênita/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
6.
Front Public Health ; 10: 832266, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35356027

RESUMO

Background: The U.S.-Mexico Border is an area of opportunity for improved health care access; however, gaps remain as to how and where U.S. border residents, particularly those who are underinsured, obtain care. Antibiotics are one of the most common reported drivers of cross-border healthcare access and a medication of particular concern since indiscriminate or inappropriate use is associated with antimicrobial resistance. In addition, many studies assessing preferences for Mexican pharmaceuticals and healthcare in U.S. border residents were done prior to 2010 when many prescription medications, including antibiotics, were available over the counter in Mexico. Methods: Data used in this study were collected during the baseline examination of an ongoing longitudinal cohort study in Starr Country, Texas, one of 14 counties on the Texas-Mexico border. Participants self-reported the name, date of use, and the source country of each antibiotic used in the past 12 months. Logistic regression was used to determine social, cultural, and clinical features associated with cross-border procurement of antibiotics. Results: Over 10% of the study cohort reported using antibiotics in the past 30 days with over 60% of all rounds used in the past 12 months sourced from Mexico. A lack of health insurance and generation score, a measure of acculturation, were the strongest predictors of cross-border procurement of antibiotics. Conclusions: Factors previously associated with cross-border acquisition of antibiotics are still present despite changes in 2010 to prescription drug regulations in Mexico. These results may be used to inform future public health initiatives to provide culturally sensitive education about responsible antibiotic stewardship and to address barriers to U.S. healthcare and pharmaceutical access in medically underserved, impoverished U.S.-Mexico border communities.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Americanos Mexicanos , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , México , Texas
7.
PLoS Med ; 18(7): e1003682, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34197449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in India on the consumption of antibiotics and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the private sector in 2020 compared to the expected level of use had the epidemic not occurred. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed interrupted time series (ITS) analyses of sales volumes reported in standard units (i.e., doses), collected at regular monthly intervals from January 2018 to December 2020 and obtained from IQVIA, India. As children are less prone to develop symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we hypothesized a predominant increase in non-child-appropriate formulation (non-CAF) sales. COVID-19-attributable changes in the level and trend of monthly sales of total antibiotics, azithromycin, and HCQ were estimated, accounting for seasonality and lockdown period where appropriate. A total of 16,290 million doses of antibiotics were sold in India in 2020, which is slightly less than the amount in 2018 and 2019. However, the proportion of non-CAF antibiotics increased from 72.5% (95% CI: 71.8% to 73.1%) in 2019 to 76.8% (95% CI: 76.2% to 77.5%) in 2020. Our ITS analyses estimated that COVID-19 likely contributed to 216.4 million (95% CI: 68.0 to 364.8 million; P = 0.008) excess doses of non-CAF antibiotics and 38.0 million (95% CI: 26.4 to 49.2 million; P < 0.001) excess doses of non-CAF azithromycin (equivalent to a minimum of 6.2 million azithromycin treatment courses) between June and September 2020, i.e., until the peak of the first epidemic wave, after which a negative change in trend was identified. In March 2020, we estimated a COVID-19-attributable change in level of +11.1 million doses (95% CI: 9.2 to 13.0 million; P < 0.001) for HCQ sales, whereas a weak negative change in monthly trend was found for this drug. Study limitations include the lack of coverage of the public healthcare sector, the inability to distinguish antibiotic and HCQ sales in inpatient versus outpatient care, and the suboptimal number of pre- and post-epidemic data points, which could have prevented an accurate adjustment for seasonal trends despite the robustness of our statistical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in non-CAF antibiotic sales, and particularly azithromycin, occurred during the peak phase of the first COVID-19 epidemic wave in India, indicating the need for urgent antibiotic stewardship measures.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hidroxicloroquina/economia , Pandemias/economia , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/economia , Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , Composição de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Índia , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(14): 923-930, 2021 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34160370

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agents on surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the use of alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agents might have a negative effect on SSI prevention, their association with SSI risk in spine surgery remains unclear. METHODS: We used the registry data of consecutive patients undergoing spine surgery from April 2017 to January 2020 in four institutions participating in the University of Tokyo Spine Group. Before March 2019, all institutions used cefazolin for antimicrobial prophylaxis. After March 2019, the institutions used broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents as an alternative due to a cefazolin shortage in Japan. RESULTS: Among the 3841 enrolled patients (2289 males), 2024 received cefazolin and 1117 received alternative agents. The risk of reoperation for deep SSI within 30 days of spine surgery was significantly higher in the alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agent group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.35; P = 0.014). In subgroup analyses, the SSI risk was significantly higher in the thoracolumbar surgery group (aOR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06-3.73; P = 0.03). A nonsignificant consistent trend was found in all other subgroups: posterior decompression (aOR 1.91; 95% CI, 0.86-4.21; P = 0.11); posterior fixation (aOR 2.05; 95% CI, 0.99-4.24; P = 0.05); and cervical spine surgery (aOR 2.30; 95% CI, 0.82-6.46; P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis agents increased the risk of reoperation for SSI after spine surgery compared with cefazolin. Our study supports the current practice of using first-generation cephalosporins as first-line antimicrobial prophylaxis agents in spine surgery as recommended in multiple guidelines.Level of Evidence: 3.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Cefazolina/provisão & distribuição , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Japão , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
10.
Acta Trop ; 220: 105943, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33965370

RESUMO

In response to the global call to mitigate risks associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR), new regulations on the access and use of veterinary antibiotics are currently being developed by the Lao government. This study aims to explore how the implementation of these new regulations might effectively reduce and adapt the sale, distribution and use of veterinary antibiotics in Lao PDR. To this end, we used the theory of change, framing the AMR issue within the context of the stakeholders involved in the veterinary antibiotics supply chain. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to collect data, based on questionnaires (n=36 antibiotic suppliers, n=96 chicken farmers, n=96 pig farmers), and participatory tools such as a workshop (n=10 participants), semi-structured interviews (n=20), and focus group discussions (n=7 participants). The stakeholders' understanding of the AMR issue and potential challenges related to the implementation of new regulations regarding access and use of antibiotics, were also investigated. We mapped the veterinary antibiotic supply chain in Lao PDR, and analysed the roles and interactions of its stakeholders. Twenty-three stakeholders representing the private and the public sectors were identified. Many informal and formal links connected these stakeholder within this supply chain. The lack of veterinarian-farmer interaction and the evolving nature of the veterinary antibiotics supply chain accentuated the challenges of achieving behaviour change through regulations. Most of the antibiotics found on farms were categorized by the World Health Organisation's as critically important antibiotics used in human medicine. We argue that AMR risk mitigation strategy requires dialogue and engagement between private and public sectors stakeholders, involved in the importation, distribution, sale and use of veterinary antibiotics. This study further highlighted that AMR is a complex adaptive challenge requiring multi-sectoral approach. We believed that a sustainable approach to reduce and adapt veterinary antibiotics use should be prepared in collaboration with stakeholders from private and public sectors identified in this study, in addition to the new regulations. This collaboration should start with the co-construction of a common understanding of AMR issue and of the objectives of new regulations.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Participação dos Interessados , Medicina Veterinária/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fazendeiros , Humanos , Laos , Setor Público , Controle Social Formal , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suínos
11.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 19(10): 1341-1352, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33792479

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic self-medication is common in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to evaluate the Sri Lankan public's knowledge about and attitudes toward antibiotic use and self-medication, and factors associated with self-medication. METHODS: A national cross-sectional, interviewer-administered, survey of a random household sample (N = 1100) was conducted. Factor analysis of the attitudinal items was conducted to investigate the factors associated with antibiotic self-medication. RESULTS: A response rate of ninety-one percent (n = 998) responded. Knowledge about antibiotics was poor (mean = 12.5; SD = 3.5; (scale 0-27)). Half had previously used an antibiotic once in the past three months. About 11% (108/998) had self-medicated the last time they took antibiotics; mostly obtained from a pharmacy (82%; 89/108). Three attitudinal factors were obtained, explaining 56.1% of the variance. Respondents were less likely to self-medicate if they did not support ease of access to antibiotics from pharmacies (p< 0.001) and situational use of antibiotics (p= 0.001); supported appropriate use of antibiotics (p= 0.003); and had greater knowledge about prescription requirements for antibiotics (p= 0.004). CONCLUSION: There is limited knowledge about, and a high rate of self-medication with antibiotics.Factors contributing to self-medication could be addressed with appropriate public education campaigns, and policy changes.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Automedicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sri Lanka , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 60, 2021 03 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33766135

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance has been named as one of the top ten threats to public health in the world. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can help reduce antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this study was to determine perceived barriers to the development and implementation of ASPs in tertiary care centers in three low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 45 physicians at tertiary care hospitals in Sri Lanka (n = 22), Kenya (12), and Tanzania (11). Interviews assessed knowledge of antimicrobial resistance and ASPs, current antimicrobial prescribing practices, access to diagnostics that inform antimicrobial use, receptiveness to ASPs, and perceived barriers to implementing ASPs. Two independent reviewers coded the interviews using principles of applied thematic analysis, and comparisons of themes were made across the three sites. RESULTS: Barriers to improving antimicrobial prescribing included prohibitively expensive antimicrobials, limited antimicrobial availability, resistance to changing current practices regarding antimicrobial prescribing, and limited diagnostic capabilities. The most frequent of these barriers in all three locations was limited drug availability. Many physicians in all three sites had not heard of ASPs before the interviews. Improved education was a suggested component of ASPs at all three sites. The creation of guidelines was also recommended, without prompting, by interviewees at all three sites. Although most participants felt microbiological results were helpful in tailoring antibiotic courses, some expressed distrust of laboratory culture results. Biomarkers like erythrocyte sedimentation rate and c-reactive protein were not felt to be specific enough to guide antimicrobial therapy. Despite limited or no prior knowledge of ASPs, most interviewees were receptive to implementing protocols that would include documentation and consultation with ASPs regarding antimicrobial prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted several important barriers to implementing ASPs that were shared between three tertiary care centers in LMICs. Improving drug availability, enhancing availability of and trust in microbiologic data, creating local guidelines, and providing education to physicians regarding antimicrobial prescribing are important steps that could be taken by ASPs in these facilities.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Quênia , Médicos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Sri Lanka , Tanzânia , Centros de Atenção Terciária
13.
Elife ; 102021 02 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33588991

RESUMO

Before the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was among the top priorities for global public health. Already a complex challenge, AMR now needs to be addressed in a changing healthcare landscape. Here, we analyse how changes due to COVID-19 in terms of antimicrobial usage, infection prevention, and health systems affect the emergence, transmission, and burden of AMR. Increased hand hygiene, decreased international travel, and decreased elective hospital procedures may reduce AMR pathogen selection and spread in the short term. However, the opposite effects may be seen if antibiotics are more widely used as standard healthcare pathways break down. Over 6 months into the COVID-19 pandemic, the dynamics of AMR remain uncertain. We call for the AMR community to keep a global perspective while designing finely tuned surveillance and research to continue to improve our preparedness and response to these intersecting public health challenges.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Procedimentos Clínicos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/fisiologia , Saúde Global/tendências , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos/tendências , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
14.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(2): e0009164, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the World Health Assembly mandated Member States to take action on rheumatic heart disease (RHD), which persists in countries with weak health systems. We conducted an assessment of the current state of RHD-related healthcare in Uganda. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This was a mixed-methods, deductive simultaneous design study conducted in four districts of Uganda. Using census sampling, we surveyed health facilities in each district using an RHD survey instrument that was modeled after the WHO SARA tool. We interviewed health workers with experience managing RHD, purposively sampling to ensure a range of qualification and geographic variation. Our final sample included 402 facilities and 36 health workers. We found major gaps in knowledge of clinical guidelines and availability of diagnostic tests. Antibiotics used in RHD prevention were widely available, but cardiovascular medications were scarce. Higher levels of service readiness were found among facilities in the western region (Mbarara district) and private facilities. Level III health centers were the most prepared for delivering secondary prevention. Health worker interviews revealed that limited awareness of RHD at the district level, lack of diagnostic tests and case management registries, and absence of clearly articulated RHD policies and budget prioritization were the main barriers to providing RHD-related healthcare. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Uganda's readiness to implement the World Health Assembly RHD Resolution is low. The forthcoming national RHD strategy must focus on decentralizing RHD diagnosis and prevention to the district level, emphasizing specialized training of the primary healthcare workforce and strengthening supply chains of diagnostics and essential medicines.


Assuntos
Instalações de Saúde/normas , Cardiopatia Reumática/diagnóstico , Cardiopatia Reumática/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/provisão & distribuição , Administração de Caso/estatística & dados numéricos , Instalações de Saúde/economia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Cardiopatia Reumática/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária/estatística & dados numéricos , Uganda
15.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(2): 297-304, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316878

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages may negatively impact outcomes in hospitalized patients. A cefepime dosing regimen of 1 gram every 6 hours (1 g q6h) has shown to provide similar exposures above target minimum inhibitory concentrations compared to the regimen of 2 g q8h approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for febrile neutropenia. Our objective was to determine if the dosing regimen of 1 g q6h amidst a cefepime shortage is an appropriate alternative for the treatment of febrile neutropenia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients who received cefepime for febrile neutropenia over a two-year period was performed. Patients were grouped based on cefepime dosing strategy: 2 g q8h vs. 1 g q6h. The primary objective was to compare time to defervescence after cefepime initiation. Secondary objectives included all-cause 30-day mortality, duration of antibiotic therapy, and inpatient length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients in each arm were included. There were no differences in baseline age or severity of illness between groups. There was no difference in the primary objective as median time to defervescence was similar between the 2 g q8h and 1 g q6h groups (69.0 vs. 65.3 h: p= 0.67). Additionally, no differences were found in the secondary objectives of all-cause 30-day mortality (10.7% vs. 9.3%: p = 0.79), duration of therapy (80.8 vs. 88.0 h: p = 0.34), or length of stay (9 vs. 7 days: p = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified no differences in clinical outcomes with cefepime 1 g q6h compared to the traditional FDA-approved 2 g q8h regimen for the treatment of febrile neutropenia.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cefepima/administração & dosagem , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Cefepima/provisão & distribuição , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Lancet Glob Health ; 9(3): e267-e279, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33333015

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Progress in reducing maternal and neonatal deaths and stillbirths is impeded by data gaps, especially regarding coverage and quality of care in hospitals. We aimed to assess the validity of indicators of maternal and newborn health-care coverage around the time of birth in survey data and routine facility register data. METHODS: Every Newborn-BIRTH Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals was an observational study in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Tanzania. We included women and their newborn babies who consented on admission to hospital. Exclusion critiera at admission were no fetal heartbeat heard or imminent birth. For coverage of uterotonics to prevent post-partum haemorrhage, early initiation of breastfeeding (within 1 h), neonatal bag-mask ventilation, kangaroo mother care (KMC), and antibiotics for clinically defined neonatal infection (sepsis, pneumonia, or meningitis), we collected time-stamped, direct observation or case note verification data as gold standard. We compared data reported via hospital exit surveys and via hospital registers to the gold standard, pooled using random effects meta-analysis. We calculated population-level validity ratios (measured coverage to observed coverage) plus individual-level validity metrics. FINDINGS: We observed 23 471 births and 840 mother-baby KMC pairs, and verified the case notes of 1015 admitted newborn babies regarding antibiotic treatment. Exit-survey-reported coverage for KMC was 99·9% (95% CI 98·3-100) compared with observed coverage of 100% (99·9-100), but exit surveys underestimated coverage for uterotonics (84·7% [79·1-89·5]) vs 99·4% [98·7-99·8] observed), bag-mask ventilation (0·8% [0·4-1·4]) vs 4·4% [1·9-8·1]), and antibiotics for neonatal infection (74·7% [55·3-90·1] vs 96·4% [94·0-98·6] observed). Early breastfeeding coverage was overestimated in exit surveys (53·2% [39·4-66·8) vs 10·9% [3·8-21·0] observed). "Don't know" responses concerning clinical interventions were more common in the exit survey after caesarean birth. Register data underestimated coverage of uterotonics (77·9% [37·8-99·5] vs 99·2% [98·6-99·7] observed), bag-mask ventilation (4·3% [2·1-7·3] vs 5·1% [2·0-9·6] observed), KMC (92·9% [84·2-98·5] vs 100% [99·9-100] observed), and overestimated early breastfeeding (85·9% (58·1-99·6) vs 12·5% [4·6-23·6] observed). Inter-hospital heterogeneity was higher for register-recorded coverage than for exit survey report. Even with the same register design, accuracy varied between hospitals. INTERPRETATION: Coverage indicators for newborn and maternal health care in exit surveys had low accuracy for specific clinical interventions, except for self-report of KMC, which had high sensitivity after admission to a KMC ward or corner and could be considered for further assessment. Hospital register design and completion are less standardised than surveys, resulting in variable data quality, with good validity for the best performing sites. Because approximately 80% of births worldwide take place in facilities, standardising register design and information systems has the potential to sustainably improve the quality of data on care at birth. FUNDING: Children's Investment Fund Foundation and Swedish Research Council.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/tratamento farmacológico , Método Canguru/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil/normas , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
18.
Trop Med Int Health ; 26(4): 397-409, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33338311

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to examine AMR-specific and AMR-sensitive factors associated with antibiotic consumption in Nepal between 2006 and 2016, to explore health care-seeking patterns and the source of antibiotics. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from children under five in households in Nepal were extracted from the 2006, 2011 and 2016 Demographic Health Surveys (DHS). Bivariable and multivariable analyses were carried out to assess the association of disease prevalence and antibiotic use with age, sex, ecological location, urban/rural location, wealth index, household size, maternal smoking, use of clean fuel, sanitation, nutritional status, access to health care and vaccinations. RESULTS: Prevalence of fever, acute respiratory infection (ARI) and diarrhoea decreased between 2006 and 2016, whilst the proportion of children under five receiving antibiotics increased. Measles vaccination, basic vaccinations, nutritional status, sanitation and access to health care were associated with antibiotic use. Those in the highest wealth index use less antibiotics and antibiotic consumption in rural areas surpassed urban regions over time. Health seeking from the private sector has overtaken government facilities since 2006 with antibiotics mainly originating from pharmacies and private hospitals. Adherence to WHO-recommended antibiotics has fallen over time. CONCLUSIONS: With rising wealth, there has been a decline in disease prevalence but an increase in antibiotic use and more access to unregulated sources. Understanding factors associated with antibiotic use will help to inform interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use whilst ensuring access to those who need them.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Saúde da Criança , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Características da Família , Febre/epidemiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Instalações de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Nepal , Pediatria , Prevalência , Setor Privado , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , População Rural , Saneamento , Classe Social
20.
Rev Med Suisse ; 16(710): 1912-1915, 2020 Oct 14.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058576

RESUMO

The extraordinary development of medicine with the advent of solid organ and bone marrow transplants, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, as well as the explosion of invasive procedures (« foreign material ¼) has made our medicine dependant to the use of antibiotics. The overuse of « empirical ¼ antibiotics in breeding and medicine has favored the emergence and rapid dissemination of multidrug resistant pathogens (MDRs). This leaded clinicians today in a difficult situation. They should limit their empirical use of « broad-spectrum antibiotics ¼, although they face a higher risk of MDRs. To help them in this task, anti-microbial stewardship programs have been put in place, emphasizing the use of « hospital antibiograms ¼ and rapid and reliable microbiological diagnosis.


L'extraordinaire développement de la médecine, avec l'avènement des greffes d'organes, des chimiothérapies et immunothérapies, ainsi que l'explosion des gestes invasifs (matériel étranger) ont rendu notre médecine dépendante des antibiotiques. La surutilisation « empirique ¼ des antibiotiques dans l'élevage et la médecine a favorisé l'émergence et la dissémination rapide de bactéries multirésistantes (BMR). Cela a conduit les cliniciens d'aujourd'hui à une situation difficile. Ils doivent limiter leur utilisation d'« antibiotiques à large spectre ¼ bien qu'ils soient confrontés à un risque plus élevé de BMR. Des programmes d'antimicrobial stewardship ont été mis en place pour les soutenir, prônant l'utilisation d'« antibiogrammes hospitaliers ¼ et d'un diagnostic microbiologique rapide et fiable.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos/efeitos dos fármacos , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos/efeitos dos fármacos , Hospitais , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...